
Mediation in state courts
an analytical comparison of mediation practices in the United States of America and BrazilBy Flávia Maria Aires Freire AllemãoLength5h 20m
About this audiobook
The large caseloads to be tried in the courts and the dissatisfaction of jurisdictions with the judgments are the main reasons for the application of mediation in the courts. The culture of litigation and the Civil Law system applied in Brazil are driving factors in order to arise more lawsuits, given to a greater possibility of different decisions for similar situations, in contrast to the Common Law, applied in almost all of the United States, where the citizen is more cautious when filing lawsuits, because it is more difficult to reverse a precedent. Given the need to change this situation, a movement began in Brazil to encourage agreements between the parties in the process, with the National Council of Justice having issued the Resolution No. 125/2010 instituting mediation and, later, the provision of such institute by the new Code of Civil Procedure of 2015. The previous Code of Civil Procedure, from 1973, already regulated conciliation, although it does not have the same effectiveness as mediation in the resolution of conflicts in a more definitive way, especially in demands whose conflict parties have a continued relationship among themselves, such as those involving Family Law, for example. Indeed, among the different types of alternative methods of conflict resolution, mediation is within the best results. So, it is of fundamental importance the comparative study of the mediation in Brazil and the United States, analyzing the participants of mediation, the types of mediation, how it is applied in practice in each country, the advantages and disadvantages and thinking how to improve the institute of mediation in both countries, considering the differences and similarities between them.
Audiobook details
GenrePolitics and Government
Length5 hrs 20 mins
Narrated byListen with 1,000+ voices
FormateBook with Audio
Publish dateOct 29, 2021
LanguageEnglish
Table of contents
1PREFACE TO FLÁVIA MARIA AIRES FREIRE ALLEMÃO, MEDIATION IN STATE COURTS: AN ANALYTICAL COMPARISON OF MEDIATION PRACTICES IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND BRAZIL (2021)
2I. INTRODUCTION
3II – OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) MECHANISMS
4A. THE NATURE OF CONFLICT
5B. BASICS OF NEGOTIATION
Show all chaptersShow less
6C. BASICS OF MEDIATION
7D. BASICS OF CONCILIATION
8E. BASICS OF EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION
9F. BASICS OF ARBITRATION
10III. MEDIATION AS A MEANS OF RESOLVING DISPUTES
11A. THE CONCEPTUAL BASICS AND PRINCIPLES OF MEDIATION
121. Liberty or Power of Decision of the Parties
132. Informality
143. Cooperation
154. Participation of an Impartial Third Person
165. Confidentiality
176. Fastness and Economy
18B. THE PARTICIPANTS IN A TYPICAL MEDIATION
191. The Parties
202. The Mediator and Co-Mediator
213. The Lawyers
224. The Judge
23C. MEDIATION TECHNIQUES
241. Principal Styles or Models of Mediation
251.Separate people from the problem
262. Stages of a Mediation
27D. INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE MEDIATION WITHIN THE COURTS: 2) The risks and effects of institutionalization
28E. CURRENT PRACTICE OF MEDIATION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
291. History and Areas of Mediation
303. Settlement Week
314. Judicial Mediation
32E. CURRENT PRACTICE OF MEDIATION IN BRAZIL
331. History and Areas of Mediation
342. “Semana da Conciliação” [Settlement Week]
353. Judicial Mediation
36IV. ASSESSMENT OF MEDIATION AS A DISPUTE RESOLUTION TOOL
37A. BENEFITS AND ADVANTAGES OF MEDIATION
381. Subjective Benefits and Advantages
392. Objective Benefits and Advantages
401. To block the Judiciary in its principal function of giving meaning to the public values
412. Privatization of justice
422. Lack of Predictability
433. Waste of Time
444. Sometimes Unfair or Against Legal Rights, Principles or Fundamental Public Polices
455. Not Adequate if a Precedent is Needed
467. Detrimental to Lawyers by reducing their Works in Courts
47V. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: B. FURTHER CONCERNS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR MEDIATION IN BRAZIL
48CONCLUSION