Summary
What if the friction that AI eliminates is the key to developing expertise? In our latest piece forThesis, investor and designerWillem Van Lanckerexplores how the struggle of learning—for him, through all-nighters, brutal critiques, and hours spent kerning at art school—creates the foundation for mastery and taste. Willem (who is an investor in Every and advised us on our early design) offers a framework for understanding this “productive friction,” drawing a distinction between automation that removes drudgery versus the kind of struggle that builds expertise. In a world where credentials matter less, such proof of work may be our most valuable currency.—Kate LeeWas this newsletter forwarded to you?Sign upto get it in your inbox.Three weeks into my first foundations class at the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD), I pulled my first all-nighter. Wrestling with clay, I was convinced I was making something profound. Then came the critique.Peers and professors dissected every poorly considered curve, every spot where I'd tried hiding incompetence with excess material. They tore my work apart. But that friction, the confrontation with my limitations, carved something permanent into me.For years, I learned this way: Attempt, fail, dissect, try again. In Color Theory, mixing a hundred shades between two hues. In Typography, I spent hours kerning a series of words until their rhythm felt just right. These weren't arbitrary exercises; they etched precise grooves in my perception. It was specific and cumulative. Friction eroded poor execution and clumsy ideas until something simpler and more elegant was revealed.Trial, error, filling skill gaps, honing hand and eye: it was reinforcement learning built through thousands of small decisions I'd been forced to defend or abandon. I carried this mindset to my design work at Apple, Google Maps, and later my own startup, Oyster.But friction, once an indispensable process of building competency and perspective, is vanishing to AI. A single prompt generates polished landing pages, completes brand systems, and ships working applications. The fruit that once required long, arduous labor now drops directly into our laps, ripe yet uncannily hollow.Automation threatens millions of jobs, but beyond near-term economic pain is a deeper concern.Entry-level rolesstand to be disproportionately affected—the places where, for generations, people went to accumulate experience and learn their craft. Knowledge risks becoming merely transactional, a commodity to be accessed, rather than relational or internalized. Information on tap instead of an ongoing dialogue with ourselves and the world. We should use automation to take away mundane obstacles and drudgery. I do. But we must recognize the distinction between that and what I callproductive friction.This is the kind of difficulty that’s worth preserving, the kind of struggle that pushes you forward as you push against it.The trick is in knowing what to look for.The path of more resistanceProductive friction has three main principles:Immediate feedback:You understand when you've failed and can see why.Cumulative learning:Each attempt builds your reference library.Transferable principles:The specific teaches the general.This manifests differently in different fields. But it’s universal. It’s also the foundation of building taste. Taste is often held up as an irreducibly human thing, thesaving graceof our uniqueness in the AI age. But taste isn’t something anyone is born with or even a deterministic goal.The focus placed on it mistakes the output for the input. And when you ask what people mean by taste, typically they’ll stumble around for a bit before landing on something like “you know it when you see it,” or list off some nice-looking design features that have been sold to them as “craft.”Taste isn’t any one thing. It isyourthing. And it’s a product of friction.All photos shot in New York City on June 23, 2025. Courtesy of Sarah Jay Halliday for Every.Taste is anaccumulated ability, earned through making and repeated discernment. It cannot be shortcut or passively consumed.It can only bloomthrough practice, care, and cumulative experience. Friction isn't inefficiency to be eliminated. It's the resistance necessary to build genuine judgment and refine taste. Its value doesn't lie in the final product but in the work itself. AI allows production without labor, creating the illusion of progress while sidestepping much of the actual learning.AI might push toward immediate legibility or conventions, but taste—my own, for instance, shaped by American sportswear, early internet aesthetics, graphic design history, and specific cultural elements from New York City and New England—is an accumulation earned only through repeated struggle in unforgiving studios, offices, and workshops. Friction, in other words.It works in subtle, but discernible, ways...Become apaid subscriber to Everyto unlock this piece and learn about:How friction forces articulation and automation can inhibit masteryThe value of intentional frictionWhat matters in a proof-of-work worldUpgrade to paidClick hereto read the full postWant the full text of all articles in RSS?Become a subscriber, orlearn more.Book information
Genre
Business and Economics
