
The Right of Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors
The Legality of the Unable or Unwilling Doctrine and How to Improve Its Application in International LawBy Eduardo GranzottoLength2h 13m
About this audiobook
"This book is the product of the author's master's thesis, defended in 2019 at King's College, in the International Peace and Security programme of the Department of War Studies. […] In light of the new contemporary threats to international peace and security and their impact on jus ad bellum rules, the author questions whether the Unable or Unwilling Doctrine(UoU), used as an argument for the use of force in the recent fight against the 'Islamic State' in Syria, has a legal basis in the context of self-defence against non-state actors. He then goes on to explore practical ways in which the doctrine's application can be improved.
[…]
In the King's College's Department of War Studies, the examiners described the author's thesis as an exceptional piece of scholarly work, absorbing from its first line and reported that the author demonstrates a striking comprehension of complex legal questions, in addition to providing coherent, insightful, and very sophisticated arguments.
Professor Granzotto's clever, perceptive, and opportune master's thesis led to a rich and particularly persuasive book, which reflects the thoughts of a mature, though young scholar ___ for whom we must predict the continuity of a superb career. "
Audiobook details
GenrePolitics and Government
Length2 hrs 13 mins
Narrated byListen with 1,000+ voices
FormateBook with Audio
Publish dateJun 7, 2021
LanguageEnglish
Table of contents
1ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
21. Introduction
32. Self-defence against non-state actors:an ongoing controversy
42.1 The right of self-defence: a lawful exception to the use of force
52.2 Non-state actors as a threat to international peace and security
Mostrar todos os capítulosVer menos
62.3 The right of self-defence against non-state actors: the attribution problem
73. The Unable or Unwilling Doctrine (UoU)
83.1 Content and origin of the UoU doctrine: the possibility to apply the law of neutrality analogically
93.2 The UoU doctrine as an emerging customary norm
103.3 Adjusting the course of the debate and mitigating the principle of sovereignty
114. The UoU test: shaping the decision-making process
124.1 Who decides on the application of the UoU test and what are the preventive measures that can be taken to improve the quality of the decision?
134.2 The armed attack is actual or imminent. What should be done?
144.3 Precautions during the military response, transparency, wand subsequent accountability
155. Conclusion
166. References